agi  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [agi] [Science Daily] Our Unconscious Brain Makes The Best Decisions Possible Kaj Sotala
  • Re: [agi] [Science Daily] Our Unconscious Brain Makes The Best Decisions Possible Vladimir Nesov
• [agi] Hypercomputation and AGI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Hypercomputation and AGI J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] Hypercomputation and AGI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Hypercomputation and AGI J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] Hypercomputation and AGI Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Hypercomputation and AGI J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] Hypercomputation and AGI Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Hypercomputation and AGI J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] Hypercomputation and AGI J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] Hypercomputation and AGI Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Hypercomputation and AGI William Pearson
  • Re: [agi] Hypercomputation and AGI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Hypercomputation and AGI William Pearson
  • Re: [agi] Hypercomputation and AGI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Hypercomputation and AGI Abram Demski
• Re: Human-centric AGI approach-paper (was Re: Indexing and Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Mike Tintner
  • Re: Human-centric AGI approach-paper (was Re: Indexing and Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Robert Swaine
  • Re: Human-centric AGI approach-paper (was Re: Indexing and Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Mike Tintner
  • Re: Human-centric AGI approach-paper (was Re: Indexing and Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Robert Swaine
  • Re: Human-centric AGI approach-paper (was Re: Indexing and Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Mike Tintner
  • Re: Human-centric AGI approach-paper (was Re: Indexing and Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Robert Swaine
  • Re: Human-centric AGI approach-paper (was Re: Indexing and Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Robert Swaine
  • [agi] Second Life & the Gaza Conflict Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] Second Life & the Gaza Conflict BillK
  • Re: [agi] Second Life & the Gaza Conflict Eric Burton
• [agi] Alternative Cicuitry John G. Rose
  • Re: [agi] Alternative Cicuitry Richard Loosemore
• [agi] Indexing Jim Bromer
  • Re: [agi] Indexing J. Andrew Rogers
• [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition. Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition. Vladimir Nesov
  • Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition. Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition. J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition. Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition. Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition. Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition. Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition. Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition. Abram Demski
  • Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition. Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition. Abram Demski
  • Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition. Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition. Abram Demski
  • Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition. Abram Demski
  • Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition. Abram Demski
  • Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition. Abram Demski
  • Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition. Abram Demski
  • Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition. Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition. Abram Demski
  • Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition. Eric Burton
  • Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition. Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition. Eric Burton
  • Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition. Russell Wallace
  • Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition. Abram Demski
  • [agi] The Self Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition. Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Introducing Steve's "Theory of Everything" in cognition. Abram Demski
• [agi] Levels of Self-Awareness? Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Levels of Self-Awareness? Philip Hunt
  • Re: [agi] Levels of Self-Awareness? Steve Richfield
• [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Philip Hunt
  • Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Philip Hunt
  • Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Philip Hunt
  • Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark J. Andrew Rogers
  • Spatial indexing (was Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark) Matt Mahoney
  • Re: Spatial indexing (was Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark) Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Matt Mahoney
  • RE: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark John G. Rose
  • RE: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Matt Mahoney
  • RE: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark John G. Rose
  • RE: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Matt Mahoney
  • RE: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark John G. Rose
  • RE: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Matt Mahoney
  • RE: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark John G. Rose
  • RE: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Matt Mahoney
  • RE: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark John G. Rose
  • RE: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Matt Mahoney
  • RE: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark John G. Rose
  • RE: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Ben Goertzel
  • RE: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark John G. Rose
  • RE: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Matt Mahoney
  • RE: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark John G. Rose
  • Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Philip Hunt
  • Real-world vs. universal prior (was Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark) Tim Freeman
  • Re: Real-world vs. universal prior (was Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark) Ben Goertzel
  • Re: Real-world vs. universal prior (was Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark) Ben Goertzel
  • Re: Real-world vs. universal prior (was Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark) David Hart
  • Re: Real-world vs. universal prior (was Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark) Ben Goertzel
  • Re: Real-world vs. universal prior (was Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark) Ben Goertzel
  • Re: Real-world vs. universal prior (was Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark) David Hart
  • Re: Real-world vs. universal prior (was Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark) Mike Tintner
  • Re: Real-world vs. universal prior (was Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark) Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Philip Hunt
  • Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Philip Hunt
  • Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Philip Hunt
  • Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Philip Hunt
  • Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Philip Hunt
  • Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Philip Hunt
  • Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Matt Mahoney
  • Re: [agi] Universal intelligence test benchmark Matt Mahoney
• Re: [agi] SyNAPSE might not be a joke ---- was ---- Building a machine that can learn from experience Richard Loosemore
  • RE: [agi] SyNAPSE might not be a joke ---- was ---- Building a machine that can learn from experience Ed Porter
  • Re: [agi] SyNAPSE might not be a joke ---- was ---- Building a machine that can learn from experience Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [agi] SyNAPSE might not be a joke ---- was ---- Building a machine that can learn from experience Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] SyNAPSE might not be a joke ---- was ---- Building a machine that can learn from experience Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [agi] SyNAPSE might not be a joke ---- was ---- Building a machine that can learn from experience Ben Goertzel
  • RE: [agi] SyNAPSE might not be a joke ---- was ---- Building a machine that can learn from experience Ed Porter
  • Re: [agi] SyNAPSE might not be a joke ---- was ---- Building a machine that can learn from experience Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [agi] SyNAPSE might not be a joke ---- was ---- Building a machine that can learn from experience Richard Loosemore
  • RE: [agi] SyNAPSE might not be a joke ---- was ---- Building a machine that can learn from experience Ed Porter
• [agi] Relevance of SE in AGI Valentina Poletti
  • Re: [agi] Relevance of SE in AGI Pei Wang
  • Re: [agi] Relevance of SE in AGI Philip Hunt
  • Re: [agi] Relevance of SE in AGI Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Relevance of SE in AGI Daniel Allen
  • Re: [agi] Relevance of SE in AGI Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [agi] Relevance of SE in AGI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Relevance of SE in AGI Richard Loosemore
  • RE: [agi] Relevance of SE in AGI John G. Rose
• [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Philip Hunt
  • Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Ben Goertzel
  • RE: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Derek Zahn
  • Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Philip Hunt
  • Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Philip Hunt
  • Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Philip Hunt
  • Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Philip Hunt
  • Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Mike Tintner
  • RE: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Derek Zahn
  • Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Ben Goertzel
  • RE: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Derek Zahn
  • Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Philip Hunt
  • Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Philip Hunt
  • Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Philip Hunt
  • Robots with a sense of touch [WAS Re: [agi] AGI Preschool....] Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Philip Hunt
  • Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Philip Hunt
  • RE: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Derek Zahn
  • Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Bob Mottram
  • Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] AGI Preschool: sketch of an evaluation framework for early stage AGI systems aimed at human-level, roughly humanlike AGI Ben Goertzel
• [agi] Creativity and Rationality (was: Re: Should I get a PhD?) Kaj Sotala
  • Re: [agi] Creativity and Rationality (was: Re: Should I get a PhD?) Pei Wang
  • Re: [agi] Creativity and Rationality (was: Re: Should I get a PhD?) Mike Tintner
  • Re: [agi] Creativity and Rationality (was: Re: Should I get a PhD?) BillK
  • Re: [agi] Creativity and Rationality (was: Re: Should I get a PhD?) Pei Wang
  • Re: [agi] Creativity and Rationality (was: Re: Should I get a PhD?) Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Creativity and Rationality (was: Re: Should I get a PhD?) Pei Wang
  • Re: [agi] Creativity and Rationality (was: Re: Should I get a PhD?) Ben Goertzel
  • Cross-Cultural Discussion using English [WAS Re: [agi] Creativity ...] Richard Loosemore
  • Re: Cross-Cultural Discussion using English [WAS Re: [agi] Creativity ...] Ben Goertzel
  • Re: Cross-Cultural Discussion using English [WAS Re: [agi] Creativity ...] Pei Wang
  • Re: Cross-Cultural Discussion using English [WAS Re: [agi] Creativity ...] Ben Goertzel
  • Re: Cross-Cultural Discussion using English [WAS Re: [agi] Creativity ...] Ben Goertzel
  • Re: Cross-Cultural Discussion using English [WAS Re: [agi] Creativity ...] Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [agi] Creativity and Rationality (was: Re: Should I get a PhD?) BillK
  • Re: [agi] Creativity and Rationality (was: Re: Should I get a PhD?) Ben Goertzel
  • RE: [agi] Creativity and Rationality (was: Re: Should I get a PhD?) John G. Rose
  • Re: [agi] Creativity and Rationality (was: Re: Should I get a PhD?) Mike Tintner
  • RE: [agi] Creativity and Rationality (was: Re: Should I get a PhD?) John G. Rose
• [agi] Building a machine that can learn from experience Rafael C.P.
  • Re: [agi] Building a machine that can learn from experience Richard Loosemore
  • Re: [agi] Building a machine that can learn from experience Steve Richfield
  • Re: [agi] Building a machine that can learn from experience Colin Hales
  • Re: [agi] Building a machine that can learn from experience YKY (Yan King Yin)
  • Re: [agi] Building a machine that can learn from experience Colin Hales
  • Re: [agi] Building a machine that can learn from experience J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] Building a machine that can learn from experience Colin Hales
  • Re: [agi] Building a machine that can learn from experience J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] Building a machine that can learn from experience Colin Hales
  • Re: [agi] Building a machine that can learn from experience Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Building a machine that can learn from experience J. Andrew Rogers
  • Re: [agi] Building a machine that can learn from experience Ben Goertzel
  • Re: [agi] Building a machine that can learn from experience J. Andrew Rogers

• Earlier messages
• Later messages