Hi,
I would also argue that a large number of weak pieces of evidence also
means that Novamente does not *understand* the domain that it is making a
judgment in. It is merely totally up weight of evidence.
I would say that intuition often consists, internally, in large part,
of summing up a large number of weak pieces of evidence...
But those masses of internally-generated judgements -- translated into
ordinary language -- would provide a very nice comprehensible explanation of
why Novamente made the decision that it did.
Well, they would be comprehensible if you had 10000 years to read them all...
ben
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
