On 1/19/07, YKY (Yan King Yin) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> "More knowledge, higher intelligence" is an intuitively attractive
> slogan, but has many problems in it. For example, more knowledge will
> easily lead to combinatorial explosion, and the reasoning system will
> derive many "true" but useless conclusions. How do you deal with that?

That's the problem of forward-chaining without a goal.  In fact, the human
mind can easily think of a lot of useless implications in a situation.  If
we have a query as a goal, we can use backward-chaining.  Otherwise we can
rank the implied sentences into levels of importance.  This does not seem to
be a show-stopper.

Backward inference faces the same problem --- more knowledge means
more possible ways to derive subgoals. No traditional control strategy
can scale up to a huge knowledge base. Importance-ranking will surely
be necesary, but this idea by itself is not enough.

Pei

-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303

Reply via email to