To avoid confusion, I never refer to my multi-valued logic as a version of "probabilistic logic", though it has some similarity/relationship with it. My reasons have been explained in several papers, like http://nars.wang.googlepages.com/wang.confidence.pdf , as well as my book.
Pei On 1/28/07, YKY (Yan King Yin) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ben, Is the probabilistic logic you use in Novamente the same as Pei Wang's version? If not, why do you use your version? YKY ________________________________ This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=303
