When I first saw this on the BBC web site I thought it looked exciting -
maybe the first "upload".  But on closer inspection it seems to be less
impressive.  There is an extremely brief report on what they did, which
looks like merely simulating a large number of neurons on a supercomputer,
without any detailed biological architecture as far as I can tell and no
mention of glial interactions.  Simulating a lot of neurons is an
achievement, and may be a precursor to uploading.

A while back I did some preliminary image processing on the BranMaps data
sets, and it is possible to automatically identify cell bodies and their
processes.  Of course this is still a long way from being able to simulate
what's going on in detail, since the images tell you nothing about the
chemistry.  Some examples are as follows:

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/45/360938915_827b42d493_o.jpg
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/137/360938913_6b7ffb9cbe_o.jpg

These are the denizens of layer 6 of the primate cortex.  Strange looking
creatures indeed.  Not at all like the neat rows of transistors that would
be found on an integrated circuit, or the highly idealised models from
computer science.  The green blobs are cell bodies.  I exchanged a few
emails with the folks at BrainMaps, and the next major step which they
anticipate is scanning the brain slices using lasers to get even higher
accuracy.  This should permit, in the not too distant future (mainly
dependent upon availability of large quantities of hard disk space and a
suitable customised scanner), complete reverse engineering of the physical
architecture of the brain.  There are difficult practical problems, such as
being able to align multiple brain slices with an accuracy sufficient for
the fine processes (dendrites and axons) to line up.

Based upon these discussions I think the first brain upload, for pure
physical architecture at least, may not be as far away as many might
suppose.  For practicality I expect the first creature to be uploaded will
be some small animal, like a mouse or rat.



On 28/04/07, J. Storrs Hall, PhD. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

In case anyone is interested, some folks at IBM Almaden have run a
one-hemisphere mouse-brain simulation at the neuron level on a Blue Gene
(in
0.1 real time):

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6600965.stm
http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/cascio20070425/
http://www.modha.org/papers/rj10404.pdf which reads in gist:

Neurobiologically realistic, large-scale cortical and sub-cortical
simulations
are bound to play a key role in computational neuroscience and its
applications to cognitive computing. One hemisphere of the mouse cortex
has
roughly 8,000,000 neurons and 8,000 synapses per neuron. Modeling at this
scale imposes tremendous constraints on computation, communication, and
memory capacity of any computing platform.
We have designed and implemented a massively parallel cortical simulator
with
(a) phenomenological spiking neuron models; (b) spike-timing dependent
plasticity; and (c) axonal delays.
We deployed the simulator on a 4096-processor BlueGene/L supercomputer
with
256 MB per CPU. We were able to represent 8,000,000 neurons (80%
excitatory)
and 6,300 synapses per neuron in the 1 TB main memory of the system. Using
a
synthetic pattern of neuronal interconnections, at a 1 ms resolution and
an
average firing rate of 1 Hz, we were able to run 1s of model time in 10s
of
real time!

Josh

-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?&;


-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=231415&user_secret=fabd7936

Reply via email to