Monday, June 11, 2007, Mark Waser wrote: MW> The only scheme that I'd possibly accept based on lines of code MW> would be one where if someone else wrote a tighter program, the original MW> writer would get negative credit (i.e. something like MW> if they wrote 7,000 lines and I re-did it with 1,000 -- I get credit MW> for half the difference for a total of 3,000 and they get credit for MW> 1,000 minus half the difference for a total of minus MW> 2,000 -- noting, of course, that if their initial code was relatively MW> good and only 1,500 and I wrote 1,000, they would still get 750 while I only get 250).
It should be hopeless either way - flexibility of code may as well suffer from too tight implementation. Good balance just can't be estimated by a simple ruler :) -- Vladimir Nesov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=231415&user_secret=e9e40a7e
