No LOC based credit please. That measure is totally bogus. Ten lines of beautifully crafted spot-on code can be more important than a 1000 lines of more ordinary code. The real measures are pretty subjective and the quality of the measure is utterly dependent on the quality and insight of the measurer. Any sort of averaging out of the measuring/measurers will average out the quality of the measure. - samantha
On 6/11/07, James Ratcliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Even if they received credit for the 7,000 lines, it would be worth very little in the overall scheme, and any code that was not good could be marked as "too be fixed" or optimized fairly easily, (similar again to the Wiki markups) to where that credit could be diminished... and any obvious spam or dragging out fo larger code would be removed. Also a time delay could be in place, so no credit is applied until 3-5 people have looked over the code, and a month has passed by, so any new spammy code would fall thru the cracks. James
----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=231415&user_secret=e9e40a7e
