I doubt "video analysis" it will be AGI. What kinds of video should we
"analyze"? But is "analysis" going to turn out to AGI? The
implementation I think must be holistic. What does "video analysis"
mean? Is it just extracting the direction of motion or orientation? The
machine must learn and adapt to video. We cannot just detect the
direction of motion nor changes in orientation, but the machine have to
respond accordingly to the changes in the video from knowledge it learned.
Even with binocular video training, I don't think the machine will
"understand" how far away an object is, the orientation, etc, without
putting the robot in an interactive simulation environment.
It should train and interact to learn by itself instead of hacks. The
depth and motion of the video should be learned and trained so it will
"understand" what depth and motion is. The only way for the robot to
train depth and motion by itself is to put the robot in an interactive
simulation environment. When the robot move in the simulation, some
objects surrounding will move, some will change in size, orientation,
etc. It therefore will understand why some objects change. For example,
whether the object itself was moving or the robot was moving; how size
relates to closeness; etc. I think that's what humans do. People whose
vision has been restored after being blind from birth have trouble
seeing depth.
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=231415&id_secret=28509528-eaff34
