Mark Waser wrote:
I'll buy internal spatio-perception (i.e. a three-d world model) but not the visual/vision part (which I believe is totally unnecessary).

Why is *vision* necessary for grounding or to completely "understand" natural language?
My mistake. I misinterpreted the definitions of vision and spatial perception. I agree that there is not a clear separation between the definition of vision and spatio-perception--spatial perception cannot exist without vision. Vision can be spatial because it does not have to be color-vision or human like vision. Spatial can be visual because you have to visually contruct the model.

-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=52495309-2cf63e

Reply via email to