Vladimir,
That may very well be the case and something that I'm unaware of. The system I have in mind basically has I/O that is algebraic structures. Everything that it deals with is modeled this way. Any sort of system that it analyzes it converts to a particular structure that represents the data. All of its internal mechanisms are mathematically abstracted out - except for ancillary hard coded "out of band" assistors, AI, statistics, database, etc. The idea is to have a system that can understand systems and generate systems specifically. If you need to model a boolean based "space" for some sort of sampled data world it "sees" and correlates to that, the thing would generate a boolean algebra modeled and represented onto that informational structure for that particular "space" instance being studied. For example electronics theory - it would need to model that world as an "instance" based on electronics descriptor items and operators in that particular world or "space" set. Electronics theory world could be "spat" out as something very minor that it understands. Not sure if my terminology is very standard but do you understand the thinking? It may very well be morphic to other AGI structures or theories I don't know but I kind of like the way it works represented as such because it seems simple and not messy but very comprehensive and has other good qualities. John From: Vladimir Nesov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] John, It doesn't really help in understanding how system described by such terms is related to implementation of AGI. It sounds pretty much like "I use a Turing Machine", but with more exotic equivalent. If you could be more specific, it'd be interesting to have at least a rough picture of what your approach is about. ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=55824739-ba7a29
