To be honest, Richard, I do wonder whether a sufficiently in-depth conversation about AGI between us would result in you changing your views about the CSP problem in a way that would accept the possibility of Novamente-type solutions.
But, this conversation as I'm envisioning it would take dozens of hours, and would require you to first spend 100+ hours studying detailed NM materials, so this seems unlikely to happen in the near future. -- Ben On Nov 12, 2007 3:32 PM, Richard Loosemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Benjamin Goertzel wrote: > > > > Ed -- > > > > Just a quick comment: Mark actually read a bunch of the proprietary, > > NDA-required Novamente documents and looked at some source code (3 years > > ago, so a lot of progress has happened since then). Richard didn't, so > > he doesn't have the same basis of knowledge to form detailed comments on > > NM, that Mark does. > > This is true, but not important to my line of argument, since of course > I believe that a problem exists (CSP), which we have discussed on a > number of occasions, and your position is not that you have some > proprietary, unknown-to-me solution to the problem, but rather that you > do not really think there is a problem. > > Richard Loosemore > > ----- > This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email > To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: > http://v2.listbox.com/member/?&; > ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=64280386-5672a0
