RE: [agi] What best evidence for fast AI?Hey Ed,
Do you believe that these comments (which were the sole contents of your
post) did the rest of us any good? If not, could you please send them to
Richard privately?
>> So perhaps you are like most people who have spent a career in AI, in that
>> the deep learning you have obtained has not spend enough time thinking about
>> the pieces of Novamente-like approaches. But it is almost certain that that
>> 25 years worth of knowledge would make it much easier for you to understand
>> Novamente-like approach than all but a very small percent of this planet/s
>> people, if you really wanted to.
>> I don't know about you, Richard, but given my mental limitations, I often
>> find I have to read some parts of paper 2 to 10 times to understand them.
>> Usually much is unsaid in most papers, even the well written ones. You often
>> have to spend time filling in the blanks and trying to imagine how what its
>> describing would actually work. Much of my understanding of the Novamente
>> approach not only comes from a broad range of reading and attending lectures
>> in AI, micro-electronic, and brain science, but also a lot of thinking about
>> what I have read and heard from other, and about what I have observed over
>> decades of my own thought processes.
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=64166306-56c5fb
