On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 06:22:37PM -0600, Bryan Bishop wrote:
> On Monday 12 November 2007 17:31, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> > If and when you find a human who is capable of having conversations
> > about horses with small farmers, rodeo riders, vets, children
> > and biomechanicians, I'll bet that they won't have a clue about
> > galaxy formation or enzyme reactions. Don't set the bar above
> > human capabilites.
> 
> Are these things supposed to be rare discussion topics? I think this 
> just serves to illustrate the wide-ranging shades of "normal" that some 
> of us see in the daily human population. This stuff is hard and we seem 
> to restrict so much to one or two variables.

Conversation is hard. You can talk to almost anyone about the weather,
but you won't be able to talk to a rodeo rider about horses the way
that other riders do.

You can read a book about "how to be a good conversationalist",
apply the basic tricks it teaches you, with great success, and 
still remain ignorant and shallow.

--linas

-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=64418119-21691d

Reply via email to