Vladimir, > What do you mean by difference in processing here?
I said the difference was after the initial processing. By processing I meant syntactic and semantic processing. After processing the syntax related sentence the realm of action is changing the system itself, rather than knowledge of how to act on the outside world. I'm fairly convinced that self-change/management/knowledge is the key thing that has been lacking in AI, which is why I find it different and interesting. >I think that both > instructions can be perceived by AI in the same manner, using the same > kind of internal representations, if IO is implemented on sufficiently > low level, for example as a stream of letters (or even their binary > codes). This way knowledge about spelling and syntax can work with > low-level concepts influencing little chunks of IO perception and > generation, and 'more semantic' knowledge can work with more > high-level aspects. It's less convenient for quick dialog system setup > or knowledge extraction from text corpus, but it should provide > flexibility. I'm not quite sure of the representation or system you are describing so I can't say what it can or cannot do. Would you expect it to be able to do the equivalent of switching to think in a different language? Will ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=84643606-cff255
