Benjamin:When I read your
post, claiming that generalization is important, I think to myself
"yeah, that is what everybody else is saying and attempting to solve -- I even gave you several examples of how generalization could work", so I
then find myself surprised that you claim that nobody is looking at it!


Quick response for now. There's a simple misreading here. No way am I saying nobody is looking at the problem! I am saying nobody is offering a solution! And none of the AGI systembuilders present or past have *acknowledged* that they haven't offered a solution - otherwise they wouldn't have made such large claims. And I am not aware of anyone even offering an equivalent of the General Test I just offered. Yeah, it's an incredibly obvious test - almost a redefinition (although just a little more, too) of "Artificial GENERAL Intelligence." But you'd be amazed how often people ignore the obvious. Look also at how strenuously Ben objected when I suggested that his definition of intelligence as "achieving *complex* goals in complex environments" should be replaced by one focussing on the *general* aspect (for AGI), which is what he really seemed to mean in one passage, (although in another text of his, the general aspect simply gets lost).

I do believe though - and I stand to be corrected - that nobody has fully identified the central importance of this problem - i.e. I agree with Joseph Gentle's: "I think making a representation of the world which can be generalised and abstracted is the emergent crux of AGI". Yes, it's still *emerging* AFAIK. If you want to correct me here, though, you'll have to quote some literature.

Yes, I'm developing & will set out a much larger argument here - later today/tomorrow. When I do, I think you'll see why people are, however subtly, avoiding the problem, .[BTW I will want to attach a photo file - can one do that?]

-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=93139505-4aa549

Reply via email to