Yes, I would be very glad to incorporate any content that I can then republish using a Wikipedia-compatible license, e.g. GNU Free Documentation License. Any weaker license, such as Apache, BSD would be OK too.
-Steve Stephen L. Reed Artificial Intelligence Researcher http://texai.org/blog http://texai.org 3008 Oak Crest Ave. Austin, Texas, USA 78704 512.791.7860 ----- Original Message ---- From: YKY (Yan King Yin) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 3:56:40 AM Subject: [agi] would anyone want to use a commonsense KB? I'm planning to collect commonsense knowledge into a large KB, in the form of first-order logic, probably very close to CycL. Would current AGI projects (OpenNARS, OpenCog, Texai, etc) find it useful? Or would you prefer to collect commonsense on your own? It seems that the Cyc KB is focused on building an ontology (hence a lot of "is_a" relations), and there's not enough emphasis on "other logical rules". I anticipate that AGIs will need plenty of such rules. YKY agi | Archives | Modify Your Subscription ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=95818715-a78a9b Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
