Mark wrote:
I wonder if you could clarify why you insist    upon GPL as opposed to a 
Berkeley-type or Apache-type license?  I believe    very strongly that both 
ends of the open source to commercial *spectrum*    are entirely unreasonable 
and that there is a reasonable middle ground where    we all can live and do 
what we need to do.  GPL is *deliberately* way too    far on the open source 
side of the spectrum.


I insist on the GPL for me (i.e. Texai) for reasons that I'll briefly mention 
in a moment, but I will not argue the wrongness of any other AGI project's 
licensing plans.  What license I should use was vetted somewhat in this forum 
about a year ago.  My post to Richard Loosemore, on the news that his work is 
not open source, saddens me as Texai will not be able exchange with him any of 
our released components.  But Richard has his reasons and that's OK.

The GPL is indeed viral by design, with the intent by its authors that it 
become pervasive.  I agree with this idea but one can easily find better 
advocates than me to debate it.  Rather, I am using the GPL for code, and the 
GNU Free Documentation License for content, to be as compatible as possible 
with the most highly motivated members of the open source, collaborative 
knowledge-building movement, in which legions of volunteers create great works, 
widely used, for the common good.  My exemplar is MediaWiki for software, and 
Wikipedia for content creation, governance, and content building by volunteers.

Here is another one of the reasons that I use the GPL, as stated in my first 
blog post a year ago:  
Contrary to naive intuition, the GPL precludes a lot of competition. Commercial 
firms rarely enter a market niche that is initially dominated by a freely 
available GPL product that meets customer needs. 


-Steve

Stephen L. Reed


Artificial Intelligence Researcher
http://texai.org/blog
http://texai.org
3008 Oak Crest Ave.
Austin, Texas, USA 78704
512.791.7860




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=98558129-0bdb63
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to