I'm sorry, I don't know what you mean by sane languages . . . .
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lukasz Stafiniak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <agi@v2.listbox.com>
Sent: Monday, May 26, 2008 7:45 AM
Subject: Re: [agi] More Info Please
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Mark Waser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What I'd rather do instead is see if we can get a .NET parallel track
started over the next few months, see if we can get everything ported,
and
see the relative productivity between the two paths. That would provide
a
provably true answer to the debate.
There are also sane languages using the C++ object model
(http://felix-lang.org/). And there is Mono, though I've heard it
falls behind .NET considerably in terms of efficiency. The thing is,
will multi-language sourcing be encouraged? (Will every contributor be
allowed to write in his language, provided it compiles with the rest?)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"OpenCog.org (Open Cognition Project)" group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/opencog?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=103754539-40ed26
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
