On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Mark Waser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What I'd rather do instead is see if we can get a .NET parallel track > started over the next few months, see if we can get everything ported, and > see the relative productivity between the two paths. That would provide a > provably true answer to the debate. > There are also sane languages using the C++ object model (http://felix-lang.org/). And there is Mono, though I've heard it falls behind .NET considerably in terms of efficiency. The thing is, will multi-language sourcing be encouraged? (Will every contributor be allowed to write in his language, provided it compiles with the rest?)
------------------------------------------- agi Archives: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: http://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: http://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=103754539-40ed26 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
