OK.  How about this . . . . Ethics is that behavior that,
when shown by you,
makes me believe that I should facilitate your survival.
Obviously, it is
then to your (evolutionary) benefit to behave ethically.

Ethics can't be explained simply by examining interactions between individuals. It's an emergent dynamic that requires explanation at the group level. It's a set of culture-wide rules and taboos - how did they get there?

I wasn't explaining ethics with that statement. I was identifying how "evolution operates in social groups in such a way that I can derive ethics" (in direct response to your question).

Ethics is a system. The *definition of ethical behavior* for a given group is "an emergent dynamic that requires explanation at the group level" because it includes what the group believes and values -- but ethics (the system) does not require belief history (except insofar as it affects current belief). History, circumstances, and understanding what a culture has the rules and taboos that they have is certainly useful for deriving more effective rules and taboos -- but it doesn't alter the underlying system which is quite simple . . . . being perceived as helpful generally improves your survival chances, being perceived as harmful generally decreases your survival chances (unless you are able to overpower the effect).

Really? I must be out of date too then, since I agree with his explanation of ethics. I haven't read Hauser yet though, so maybe you're right.

The specific phrase you cited was "human collectives with certain taboos make the group as a whole more likely to persist". The correct term of art for this is "group selection" and it has pretty much *NOT* been supported by scientific evidence and has fallen out of favor.

Matt also tends to conflate a number of ideas which should be separate which you seem to be doing as well. There need to be distinctions between ethical systems, ethical rules, cultural variables, and evaluations of ethical behavior within a specific cultural context (i.e. the results of the system given certain rules -- which at the first-level seem to be reasonably standard -- with certain cultural variables as input). Hauser's work identifies some of the common first-level rules and how cultural variables affect the results of those rules (and the derivation of secondary rules). It's good detailed, experiment-based stuff rather than the vague hand-waving that you're getting from armchair philosophers.

I fail to see how your above explanation is anything but an elaboration of the idea that ethics is due to group selection. The following statements all support it: - "memes [rational or otherwise] when adopted by a group can enhance group survival"
- "Ethics is first and foremost what society wants you to do."
- "ethics turns into a matter of determining what is the behavior that is best for society"

I think we're stumbling over your use of the term "group selection" and what you mean by "ethics is due to group selection". Yes, the group "selects" the cultural variables that affect the results of the common ethical rules. But "group selection" as a term of art in evolution generally meaning that the group itself is being selected or co-evolved -- in this case, presumably by ethics -- which is *NOT* correct by current scientific understanding. The first phrase that you quoted was intended to point out that both good and bad memes can positively affect survival -- so co-evolution doesn't work. The second phrase that you quoted deals with the results of the system applying common ethical rules with cultural variables. The third phrase that you quoted talks about determining what the best cultural variables (and maybe secondary rules) are for a given set of circumstances -- and should have been better phrased as "Improving ethical evaluations turns into a matter of determining . . . "




-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=111637683-c8fa51
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to