Hi Ben,
You may have stated this explicitly in the past, but I just want to clarify -
you seem to be suggesting that a phenomenological self is important if not
critical to the actualization of general intelligence. Is this your belief, and
if so, can you provide a brief justification of that? (I happen to believe
this myself.. just trying to understand your philosophy better.)
Terren
--- On Thu, 9/4/08, Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, I think that not all psychologically-embodied systems possess a
sufficiently rich psychological-embodiment to lead to significantly general
intelligence.... My suggestion is that a laptop w/o network connection or odd
sensor-peripherals, probably does not have sufficiently rich correlations btw
its I/O stream and its physical state, to allow it to develop a robust
self-model of its physical self (which can then be used as a basis for a more
general phenomenal self).
-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=111637683-c8fa51
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
