--- On Thu, 9/18/08, Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I believe there is a qualitative difference btw AGI and narrow-AI, so that no >tractably small collection of computationally-feasible narrow-AI's (like >Google etc.) are going to achieve general intelligence at the human level or >anywhere near. I think you need an AGI architecture & approach that is >fundamentally different from narrow-AI approaches...
Well, yes, and that difference is a distributed index, which has yet to be built. Also, what do you mean by "human level intelligence"? What test do you use? My calculator already surpasses human level intelligence depending on the tests I give it. -- Matt Mahoney, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=114414975-3c8e69 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
