Matt M wrote: > > >Peculiarly, you are leaving out what to me is by far the most important > and interesting goal: > > > >The creation of beings far more intelligent than humans yet benevolent > toward humans > > That's what I mean by an automated economy. Google is already more > intelligent than any human at certain tasks. So is a calculator. Both are > benevolent. They differ in the fraction of our tasks that they can do for > us. When that fraction is 100%, that's AGI.
I believe there is a qualitative difference btw AGI and narrow-AI, so that no tractably small collection of computationally-feasible narrow-AI's (like Google etc.) are going to achieve general intelligence at the human level or anywhere near. I think you need an AGI architecture & approach that is fundamentally different from narrow-AI approaches... ben ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=114414975-3c8e69 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
