On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Matt Mahoney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This will be practical once we have a million-fold decrease in the cost of > computation, based on the cost of simulating a brain sized neural network. It > could occur sooner if we discover more efficient > solutions. So far we have not.
Nor have I stopped looking :-) > If you are selecting a language for self improving AI using a genetic > algorithm Oh, I gave up on that approach years ago, what with wanting a solution before the sun burns out and all. > If you are selecting a language to implement language or vision, good choices > are C, C++, and assembler. The primary concern is efficiency and the ability > to make good use of underlying parallelism in the hardware. The choice will > probably be less important as hardware gets faster. The above are reasonable choices for low level pixel crunching, if that's all your project is doing. None of them is remotely suitable for implementing anything related to language. ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=117534816-b15a34 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
