On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 8:29 PM, Russell Wallace
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Vladimir Nesov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It's a specific problem: jumping right to the code generation to
>> specification doesn't work, because you'd need too much specification.
>> At the same time, a human programmer will need much less
>> specification, so it's a question of how to obtain and use background
>> knowledge, a general question of AI. The conclusion is that this is
>> not the way.
>
> Oh, it's not step one or step two, that's for sure! I did say it was a
> prospect for the longer term.
>

You are describing it as a step one, with writing huge specifications
by hand in formally interpretable language.

-- 
Vladimir Nesov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://causalityrelay.wordpress.com/


-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=117534816-b15a34
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to