--- On Fri, 10/31/08, Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hutter's proof that Occam's Razor (in a certain form) is key to intelligence depends on
1) a specific definition of what "intelligence" is 2) a restriction to intelligent systems with a huge amount of computational resources as well as 3) an assumption that the universe is in-principle computable To me, personally, 2 is the biggest worry. I'm willing to accept 3 as an interesting working hypothesis, and 1 as a guide for ongoing work, but it seems likely to me that for intelligent systems with feasibly modest computational resources, other fundamental principles are required along with Occam-like ones. --- No, Hutter does not say (2). AIXI says that optimal intelligence is not computable at all. -- Matt Mahoney, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=117534816-b15a34 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
