--- On Mon, 11/17/08, Richard Loosemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, let me phrase it like this:  I specifically say (or
> rather I should have done... this is another thing I need to
> make more explicit!) that the predictions are about making
> alterations at EXACTLY the boundary of the "analysis
> mechanisms".
> 
> So, when we test the predictions, we must first understand
> the mechanics of human (or AGI) cognition well enough to be
> able to locate the exact scope of the analysis mechanisms.
> 
> Then, we make the tests by changing things around just
> outside the reach of those mechanisms.
> 
> Then we ask subjects (human or AGI) what happened to their
> subjective experiences.  If the subjects are ourselves -
> which I strongly suggest must be the case - then we can ask
> ourselves what happened to our subjective experiences.
> 
> My prediction is that if the swaps are made at that
> boundary, then things will be as I state.  But if changes
> are made within the scope of the analysis mechanisms, then
> we will not see those changes in the qualia.
> 
> So the theory could be falsified if changes in the qualia
> are NOT consistent with the theory, when changes are made at
> different points in the system.  The theory is all about the
> analysis mechanisms being the culprit, so in that sense it
> is extremely falsifiable.
> 
> Now, correct me if I am wrong, but is there anywhere else
> in the literature where you have you seen anyone make a
> prediction that the qualia will be changed by the alteration
> of a specific mechanism, but not by other, fairly similar
> alterations?

Your predictions are not testable. How do you know if another person has 
experienced a change in qualia, or is simply saying that they do? If you do the 
experiment on yourself, how do you know if you really experience a change in 
qualia, or only believe that you do?

There is a difference, you know. Belief is only a rearrangement of your 
neurons. I have no doubt that if you did the experiments you describe, that the 
brains would be rearranged consistently with your predictions. But what does 
that say about consciousness?

-- Matt Mahoney, [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=120640061-aded06
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to