Ben Goertzel wrote:
Hi,
Because some folks find that they are not subjectively
sufficient to explain everything they subjectively experience...
That would be more convincing if such people were to show evidence
that they understand what algorithmic processes are and can do.
I'm almost tempted to class such verbalizations as "meaningless
noise", but that's probably too strong a reaction.
Push comes to shove, I'd have to say I'm one of those people.
But you aren't one who asserts that that *IS* the right answer. Big
difference. (For that matter, I have a suspicion that there are
non-algorithmic aspects to consciousness. But I also suspect that they
are "implementation details".)
...
ben g
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*agi* | Archives <https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now>
<https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/> | Modify
<https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;>
Your Subscription [Powered by Listbox] <http://www.listbox.com>
-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription:
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=123753653-47f84b
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
