I meant, I think that we both agree that creativity and imagination are absolutely necessary aspects of intelligence.
of course! On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Jim Bromer <jimbro...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Mike Tintner > <tint...@blueyonder.co.uk>wrote: >> >> >> And programs as we know them, don't and can't handle *concepts* - despite >> the misnomers of "conceptual graphs/spaces" etc wh are not concepts at all. >> They can't for example handle "writing" or "shopping" because these can only >> be expressed as flexible outlines/schemas as per ideograms. >> > > I disagree with this, and so this is proper focus for our disagreement. > Although there are other aspects of the problem that we probably disagree > on, this is such a fundamental issue, that nothing can get past it. Either > programs can deal with flexible outlines/schema or they can't. If they > can't then AGI is probably impossible. If they can, then AGI is probably > possible. > > I think that we both agree that creativity and imagination is absolutely > necessary aspects of intelligence. > > Jim Bromer > > > > > ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=8660244-6e7fb59c Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
