Hi Sébastien,

On Thursday 17 June 2010, Sébastien Volle wrote:
> You should note that the Trac instance we're using is pretty old, ie
>  it has undergone a lots of customization but this I don't see how it
>  could affect how the burndown chart is generated.

While you're not using the most recent 0.11.x release, your version is 
not known to cause this amount of headache. In 1.3.0.1, the burndown 
history (i.e. remaining time before now()) is stored in the database, 
and not calculated on the fly. So in theory, if you see a burndown data 
point at 42 two days ago, it should still be there tomorrow. In previous 
versions, if tickets changed their type or lost some fields, they would 
be lost for historic burndown calculation.

The exact issue that you described is not something I have heard before. 
I would strongly encourage you to try Agilo on a vanilla trac instance 
and re-add the plugins you have installed as needed. It's probably an 
interaction between Agilo and one of them that causes the issue, but I 
cannot say which one it would be -- maybe the timingandestimationplugin?


Regards

Robert

-- 
Follow Agilo on Twitter: http://twitter.com/agiloforscrum
Please support us by reviewing and voting on: 
http://userstories.com/products/8-agilo-for-scrum 
http://ohloh.net/p/agilo-scrum 
http://freshmeat.net/projects/agiloforscrum

You have received this message because you are subscribed to
the "Agilo for Scrum" Google Group. This group is focused on
supporting Agilo for Scrum users and is moderated by
agile42 GmbH <http://www.agile42.com>.

To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/agilo

Reply via email to