Also note the following incompatibilities: ADoP and Promotor, Promotor
and Assessor, Referee and Arbitor.
On 05/19/2017 11:49 AM, Nic Evans wrote:
I initiate an election for Assessor, as there has been no election
since the last win. I initiate the Agoran decision to determine the
new Assessor. For this decision, the vote collector is the ADoP and
the valid options are the players (PRESENT is also a valid vote).
For the Assessor election I vote 'nichdel' followed by any other player
that votes for emself in the order that eir votes are submitted.
Since the Assessor doesn't actually have a report, it'd be best to set
its Payrate higher than average.
I don't feel any changes to Assessor are necessary, unless people want
to remove the ability to re-arrange resolution (though I think that may
be useful to prevent dangerous scams in the future).
I initiate an election for Promotor, as there has been no election
since the last win. I initiate the Agoran decision to determine the
new Promotor. For this decision, the vote collector is the ADoP and
the valid options are the players (PRESENT is also a valid vote).
For the Promotor election I endorse Aris.
Promotor's monthly intake should probably be close to Assessor's.
I don't know of any changes needed for Promotor.
I initiate an election for Rulekeepor, as there has been no election
since the last win. I initiate the Agoran decision to determine the
new Rulekeepor. For this decision, the vote collector is the ADoP and
the valid options are the players (PRESENT is also a valid vote).
For the Rulekeepor election, if G. replies with something that would be
a valid vote if e were a player, I cast that as my vote. Else I endorse
Gaelan.
Rulekeepor's monthly intake should probably be the highest of all offices.
I don't know of any changes needed for promotor.
I initiate an election for Arbitor, as there has been no election
since the last win. I initiate the Agoran decision to determine the
new Arbitor. For this decision, the vote collector is the ADoP and the
valid options are the players (PRESENT is also a valid vote).
For the Arbitor election I endorse ais523.
I'm not certain what's appropriate for Arbitor pay.
I'm fairly convinced self-service is largely useless. If it's nobody's
responsibility, nobody will do it. It's probably better to encourage
players to deputize and assign all outstanding CFJs than to only take
one or two.
