On 09/26/17 16:02, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Tue, 26 Sep 2017, Nic Evans wrote: >> I personally find it frustrating that we vote on things before the last >> setis resolved. This should be a relatively safe way to slow down, if we >> want to. > Really, it overlapped wholly because you were late on Assessment, and your > response is to give the Promotor another task and slow the whole game down? > > This is absurd. Was going to let it pass, but I point the Finger at Nichdel > for late Assessment of Decision to Adopt proposal 7876. > > I note, for the purposes of determining carding, that this lateness had a > direct and material impact on my own earnings as well as others. > > I note to the Referee, so e can feel informed and NOT believe that there are > no rules violations this week, that Nichdel was similarly late on proposals > 7877-7898. > > Sorry - lateness happens, most is not a big deal, but this is a really poor > response to be frustrated at the voting system as a result.
Even if I'm not late this can and does still happen. Assessment is 7-14 days after promotion, and promotion is weekly. I'm not trying to punish anyone else, I'm trying to make my own failure less catastrophic for gamestate. I resign from Assessor. > > -G. > > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
