On 09/26/2017 04:13 PM, Nic Evans wrote:
On 09/26/17 16:02, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017, Nic Evans wrote:
I personally find it frustrating that we vote on things before the last
setis resolved. This should be a relatively safe way to slow down, if we
want to.
Really, it overlapped wholly because you were late on Assessment, and your
response is to give the Promotor another task and slow the whole game down?
This is absurd. Was going to let it pass, but I point the Finger at Nichdel
for late Assessment of Decision to Adopt proposal 7876.
I note, for the purposes of determining carding, that this lateness had a
direct and material impact on my own earnings as well as others.
I note to the Referee, so e can feel informed and NOT believe that there are
no rules violations this week, that Nichdel was similarly late on proposals
7877-7898.
Sorry - lateness happens, most is not a big deal, but this is a really poor
response to be frustrated at the voting system as a result.
Even if I'm not late this can and does still happen. Assessment is 7-14
days after promotion, and promotion is weekly. I'm not trying to punish
anyone else, I'm trying to make my own failure less catastrophic for
gamestate.
I resign from Assessor.
I pledge to provide, informally, an accurate tabulation of any Agoran
Decisions the Assessor must resolve, within 2 weeks of the day the duty
would become late, until the next time someone officially publishes the
results of an Agoran Decision as Assessor.
-G.
