I assign CFJ 3700 to Murphy.
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 10:55 AM Reuben Staley <reuben.sta...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Whereas I believe it is healthier for Agora if stuff like this wasn't
> allowed, I self-file a motion to reconsider CFJ 3700.
>
> And whereas I feel that my judgements as of late have caused much
> contention, I recuse myself from the aforementioned case.
>
> --
> Trigon
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019, 08:36 Kerim Aydin <ke...@uw.edu wrote:
>
> >
> > Goddammit, If this is upheld to be a Notice of Honor, I'm done with
> > officering for a while - beyond my "reasonable effort" level (This isn't
> > directed at CuddleBeam, who is merely taking a line of CFJ logic to its
> > inevitable conclusion).
> >
> > I do rather wish we'd been willing to draw a line in the sand about
> > favoring
> > plain rules readings instead of over-abstractions, but I'm in the
> minority
> > I
> > guess :(.
> >
> > Aaand that's enough Agora for me today.
> >
> > On 2/7/2019 6:42 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> > > In light of this development, I define the following:
> > >
> > > - "I swoopie A swoopie X and B, swoppie Y" as shorthand for "This is a
> > > notice of honor. +1 Karma to A for X, and -1 Karma to B for Y", where A
> > and
> > > B are players, and X and Y are reasons.
> > > - "I hngaaaaah X for Y" as shorthand for "I make the following Proposal
> > > with title X, and content: Y", where X is a title and Y is proposal
> > content.
> > > - "yum", "han" and "yip" as shorthand for "I object."
> > > - "yuck", "jow" and "hiff" as shorthand for "I support."
> > > - "kuukie" as shorthand for "I intend to"
> > > - "dvba" as shorthand for "declare victory by apathy"
> > > - "za" as shorthand for "vote FOR"
> > > - "az" as shorthand for "vote AGAINST"
> > >
> > > I swoopie Trigon swoopie for this new development and Agora swoopie I
> > don't
> > > know who really merits less Karma currently.
> > >
> > > If there are any proposals I can currently za for, I za them.
> > >
> > > kuukie dvba for myself.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 3:21 PM D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I withdraw this. After re-reading Trigon’s judgement, I think it’s not
> > >> necessary
> > >>
> > >>> On Feb 6, 2019, at 12:42 PM, D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> I submit and pend this proposal:
> > >>>
> > >>> Title: Quang Revived
> > >>> AI: 1
> > >>> Coauthors: twg
> > >>>
> > >>> Amend Rule 2496 to replace the first paragraph with the following:
> > >>>
> > >>> { A player CAN earn the set of assets associated with a reward
> > condition
> > >> exactly once in a timely fashion each time e fulfills it by stating
> how
> > >> many assets e earns as a result of this action or, in the case where
> the
> > >> reward condition is satisfied for publishing a duty-fulfilling report,
> > by
> > >> stating that e quangs the office whose holder is duty bound to publish
> > said
> > >> report. }
> > >>
> >
>
