I object.
> On Feb 10, 2019, at 7:47 AM, Cuddle Beam <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Tukly han dnfficlxsmemx yum
>
>> On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 at 13:56, Jacob Arduino <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I jow D. Margaux's dnfficlxsmemx
>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019, 10:02 Cuddle Beam <[email protected] wrote:
>>>
>>> I’d yum to your dnfficlxsmemx if I could.
>>>
>>> I define “tulky” and “maah” as “the following means nothing at all, don’t
>>> take it seriously:”
>>>
>>> tulky dvba for D. Margaux
>>>
>>> maah I declare a Dictatorship with 8008135 Power.
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 15:50, D. Margaux <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I define dnfficlxsmemx to mean “object to the below intent.”
>>>>
>>>> I dnfficlxsmemx
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 9:42 AM Cuddle Beam <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In light of this development, I define the following:
>>>>>
>>>>> - "I swoopie A swoopie X and B, swoppie Y" as shorthand for "This is
>> a
>>>>> notice of honor. +1 Karma to A for X, and -1 Karma to B for Y",
>> where A
>>>> and
>>>>> B are players, and X and Y are reasons.
>>>>> - "I hngaaaaah X for Y" as shorthand for "I make the following
>> Proposal
>>>>> with title X, and content: Y", where X is a title and Y is proposal
>>>>> content.
>>>>> - "yum", "han" and "yip" as shorthand for "I object."
>>>>> - "yuck", "jow" and "hiff" as shorthand for "I support."
>>>>> - "kuukie" as shorthand for "I intend to"
>>>>> - "dvba" as shorthand for "declare victory by apathy"
>>>>> - "za" as shorthand for "vote FOR"
>>>>> - "az" as shorthand for "vote AGAINST"
>>>>>
>>>>> I swoopie Trigon swoopie for this new development and Agora swoopie I
>>>> don't
>>>>> know who really merits less Karma currently.
>>>>>
>>>>> If there are any proposals I can currently za for, I za them.
>>>>>
>>>>> kuukie dvba for myself.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 3:21 PM D. Margaux <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I withdraw this. After re-reading Trigon’s judgement, I think it’s
>>> not
>>>>>> necessary
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Feb 6, 2019, at 12:42 PM, D. Margaux <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I submit and pend this proposal:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Title: Quang Revived
>>>>>>> AI: 1
>>>>>>> Coauthors: twg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Amend Rule 2496 to replace the first paragraph with the
>> following:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> { A player CAN earn the set of assets associated with a reward
>>>>> condition
>>>>>> exactly once in a timely fashion each time e fulfills it by stating
>>> how
>>>>>> many assets e earns as a result of this action or, in the case
>> where
>>>> the
>>>>>> reward condition is satisfied for publishing a duty-fulfilling
>>> report,
>>>> by
>>>>>> stating that e quangs the office whose holder is duty bound to
>>> publish
>>>>> said
>>>>>> report. }
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
