I object, both to any intents this may create and to people taking this gibberish thing waaaaay too far.
Gaelan > On Feb 10, 2019, at 4:56 AM, Jacob Arduino <[email protected]> wrote: > > I jow D. Margaux's dnfficlxsmemx > >> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019, 10:02 Cuddle Beam <[email protected] wrote: >> >> I’d yum to your dnfficlxsmemx if I could. >> >> I define “tulky” and “maah” as “the following means nothing at all, don’t >> take it seriously:” >> >> tulky dvba for D. Margaux >> >> maah I declare a Dictatorship with 8008135 Power. >> >>> On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 15:50, D. Margaux <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I define dnfficlxsmemx to mean “object to the below intent.” >>> >>> I dnfficlxsmemx >>> >>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 9:42 AM Cuddle Beam <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> In light of this development, I define the following: >>>> >>>> - "I swoopie A swoopie X and B, swoppie Y" as shorthand for "This is a >>>> notice of honor. +1 Karma to A for X, and -1 Karma to B for Y", where A >>> and >>>> B are players, and X and Y are reasons. >>>> - "I hngaaaaah X for Y" as shorthand for "I make the following Proposal >>>> with title X, and content: Y", where X is a title and Y is proposal >>>> content. >>>> - "yum", "han" and "yip" as shorthand for "I object." >>>> - "yuck", "jow" and "hiff" as shorthand for "I support." >>>> - "kuukie" as shorthand for "I intend to" >>>> - "dvba" as shorthand for "declare victory by apathy" >>>> - "za" as shorthand for "vote FOR" >>>> - "az" as shorthand for "vote AGAINST" >>>> >>>> I swoopie Trigon swoopie for this new development and Agora swoopie I >>> don't >>>> know who really merits less Karma currently. >>>> >>>> If there are any proposals I can currently za for, I za them. >>>> >>>> kuukie dvba for myself. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 3:21 PM D. Margaux <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I withdraw this. After re-reading Trigon’s judgement, I think it’s >> not >>>>> necessary >>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 6, 2019, at 12:42 PM, D. Margaux <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I submit and pend this proposal: >>>>>> >>>>>> Title: Quang Revived >>>>>> AI: 1 >>>>>> Coauthors: twg >>>>>> >>>>>> Amend Rule 2496 to replace the first paragraph with the following: >>>>>> >>>>>> { A player CAN earn the set of assets associated with a reward >>>> condition >>>>> exactly once in a timely fashion each time e fulfills it by stating >> how >>>>> many assets e earns as a result of this action or, in the case where >>> the >>>>> reward condition is satisfied for publishing a duty-fulfilling >> report, >>> by >>>>> stating that e quangs the office whose holder is duty bound to >> publish >>>> said >>>>> report. } >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
