On Tue, 2021-06-15 at 00:11 -0700, Aris Merchant via agora-official wrote: > ID Author(s) AI Title > ------------------------------------------------------------------- I vote as follows: > 8574& Trigon, Jason, Aris 1.0 mending the quill FOR (the wording here is awkward but it's still an improvement) > 8575& Jason, Gaelan 2.0 Stone Win Delay v2 FOR > 8576* Jason, Aris, Murphy 3.0 "By announcement" loosening FOR > 8577* Jason 3.0 Festival intent eligibility FOR > 8578& Jason, Trigon 2.0 Auction limitation ENDORSE G. > 8579* Jason, Trigon 3.0 AI voting method clarification v2 FOR > 8580* Jason, ais523, Trigon 3.0 Strength Buying Separation v2 FOR > 8581& Aris 1.0 Grants on Resets AGAINST > 8582& Aris 2.0 The Artistry Lies in the Art PRESENT > 8583* Murphy 3.0 Clarify switches FOR > 8584* Murphy 3.0 Effective deference AGAINST; it's easy enough to avoid introducing a contradiction, as shown in your first example, and allowing low-power rules to ever overrule high-power rules (even with their permission) makes me suspicious that something might break or be scammable, even though I can't immediately think of any examples > 8585* Murphy 3.0 Clarify variable voting period FOR > 8586* Murphy 3.0 Clarify deputisation FOR > 8587& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify nomination period PRESENT; this gives the ADoP two different "CAN"s to perform the same action, which I think works (there's no contradiction), but it's ugly and goes against how many people think about how actions work > 8588& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify stone retrieval AGAINST; as many other people pointed out, this prevents the L&FD owning coins, and doesn't explain why > 8589& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal A AGAINST > 8590& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal B AGAINST > 8591& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal C AGAINST > 8592& ATMunn 1.0 Secret proposal D AGAINST
-- ais523
