I vote: >> 8584* Murphy 3.0 Effective deferenceEndorse ais523. I >> think limiting deference to being within-power deference only is a security design choice not a bug - not convinced on changing it.
>> 8586* Murphy 3.0 Clarify deputisation FOR. *thank you* for finally doing this. >> 8587& Murphy, G. 2.0 Clarify nomination period > AGAINST due to text collision/reversion - it would leave a procedural mess > with duplicative text but not identical to Rule 2651. No change of vote for 8587, just highlighting the issue. -G.
