root wrote: > As you note, it is the rules that give the announcement its legal > status as a cast vote, so it sounds to me like what you're arguing is > "ISIDTID as long as the action is recognized by the rules", which > isn't really ISIDTID at all. But maybe I'm misunderstanding.
Oh, hrm, yes that's what I'm arguing, you mean that if the rules explicitly allow ISID to actually D, it's no longer ISIDTID? Or rather, it ISIDTID, but the explicit legal link between IS and ID means it is no longer ATCOISIDTIDTHPAFALT? I can buy that. (that Wile E. Coyote splat you just heard was BobTHJ). -Goethe
