Peekee wrote: > 1) It is true if it changed the Gamestate as intended. > 2) The statement is really "I attempt to vote FOR" and is true regardless. > 3) The statement can not be assigned a truth value. It is neither true =20 > nor false. It is simply a construct or depending on how you look at it =20 > an "action". An action that may or may not change the Gamestate =20 > depending on how it is intepreted.
Nice summary, yes, and since distinguishing between these three is where the rules are silent, a judge would need to choose... I'd choose 3 (Michael had the best arguments for that I've seen so far). > 2) A knave can not do anything. Actually, I think a knave can do things under this one, but everything e does would be illegal and punishable (SHALL NOT vs. CAN NOT, do I have that right?) -Goethe
