On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3. The above is no different than transferring your ability to vote to
> someone (then revoking said permission). That has been established as a
> clear and binding agreement in the courts, even when you can change your
> mind at any time and when it (arguably) imposes no burden on you.
Perhaps. By default, an agreement like
{
comex authorizes root to vote for em
}
cannot be left without consent from both parties, if it is a contract.
Then again, what CFJ are you referring to? Contract changes have only
been in place in their present form for two months.
In fact, with the present rules, if such an agreement was made, you
could join that agreement by announcement (since it does not regulate
how people can become parties to it) and thereby prevent root and I
from breaking the contract even with our mutual consent.
