On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Verrry slippery. Take it from the other side, then. What is to prevent >> you from saying "hey! In between my posting consent and you posting the >> message, I (quietly to myself) changed my mind!" > > Nothing. What's the problem?
The problem is it's unreasonable to run a legal system based on the possibility that you might have changed your mind and not told anyone until after the judgement was posted in good faith. You can't after-the-fact "take things back" in any other aspects of the game, why this one? -Goethe
