On Thu, 15 May 2008, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2008, comex wrote:
>> Exactly!  ALREADY TRIED, the explicit mechanism for dealing with dupe
>> trials, requires it to be the same rule or it doesn't count.  
>
> That doesn't change my argument.  R101 would have precedence and prevent
> the trial altogether.  It's not implicit, it's explicit.

Sorry, I didn't mean "prevent" the trial, I meant make it illegal to
start the second one, as doing so abridges/limits etc. my rights.

-Goethe





Reply via email to