root wrote: > Does it seem odd to anybody else that the net effect of denouncing > another player's vote on a democratic proposal is to damage that > proposal's VI, regardless of which way the denounced player actually > voted on it?
I can't answer that yet, because I haven't figured out the motivation for denouncing someone (I just threw it in for parallelism). The motivation for endorsing someone is presumably "I don't really care about this proposal, but rather than voting PRESENT, I'll log-roll toward <player endorsed> with the assumption of some future payback".
