On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 8:59 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 4:39 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> 5564 D0 2 root Repeal Partnerships >> AGAINST > > If I may ask, why do you support retaining a construct that is only > useful for running scams?
Consider the AFO and its participation in the AAA and voting. Although partnerships are very useful for running scams, they are not solely useful for that purpose. In fact, consider also deregistered players playing through partnerships, which lets them violate the 30-day limit or an EXILE, at the cost of losing many capabilities of a real player and having to cooperate with their partners. I still think "Groups" wouldn't be such a bad idea. But not repealing the things altogether (which, IIRC you proposed before, when partnerships had just been created).
