On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Ed Murphy <emurph...@socal.rr.com> wrote:
> Which, as noted, is exactly how I intended #7 to operate.  (We have
> other rules with even less significant effect.)  If the courts decide
> otherwise, then so be it, but until then I'm not conceding the issue.

The problem is that SHOULD is used for several important functions. I
read SHOULD as "should, unless you can justify yourself to a judge".

-- 
Taral <tar...@gmail.com>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
    -- Unknown

Reply via email to