Sean Hunt wrote: > (a) the Accused breached the specified rule via the specified act. > > In Yally's case, e published eir report, entitled [IADoP] Office Report, > in both HTML and plain text through the use of a MIME multipart message. > Rule 2143 states that > Reports SHALL be published in plain text. Tabular data must > line up properly when viewed in a monospaced font. Publishing > reports that deviate from these regulations is the Class 6 Crime > of Making My Eyes Bleed. > In particular, it is not the failure to publish a plaintext report that > is the crime; it is the publication of a non-plaintext report.
I don't see that that interpretation necessarily follows from that text, and IIRC this very point of interpretation was one of the key controversies of the case. Can you explain in more detail how you arrived at your reasoning?
