On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 23:21 -0700, Rodlen wrote: > Okay, I hereby consent to that rest destruction stuff. Oh dear, now we're going to have an argument about what "unanimous Support of the panel's other members" in rule 2157 means. Just to make things unambiguous, could you "intend, with unanimous panel support, to destroy 4 rests in ais523's possession"?
-- ais523
