On Sat, 2009-06-06 at 10:11 -0700, Taral wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Alex Smith<ais...@bham.ac.uk> wrote:
> > I remind the appeals panel in CFJ 2480a ({Wooble, Rodlen, Tiger}) that
> > they CAN and SHALL destroy the 4 rests I own:
> > {{{
> > If a verdict or sentence that led to
> > the creation of Rests is overruled, remanded, or reassigned, the
> > Rests are still considered to have been created, but the appeals
> > panel CAN and SHALL destroy any created Rests by announcement.
> > }}}
>
> Bah. This should be made a platonic consequence of the judgement of
> the appeals panel.
I've already submitted a (now-distributable) proposal to make it a
pragmatic consequence.
--
ais523
