On Sun, 2009-06-07 at 08:55 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Alex Smith <ais...@bham.ac.uk> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 23:02 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote:
> >> ========================= Criminal Case 2480 =========================
> >> Appeal: 2480a
> >> Decision: REMAND
> >>
> >> Judge: Taral
> >> Judgement: NOT GUILTY
> >> ========================================================================
> >
> > I remind the appeals panel in CFJ 2480a ({Wooble, Rodlen, Tiger}) that
> > they CAN and SHALL destroy the 4 rests I own:
>
> I intend, with the Support of Rodlen and Tiger, to cause the panel to
> send the following message:
>
> {{
> We destroy 4 rests in ais523's possession.
> }}
>
> I support any previous intents by panelists in this case that I've missed.
Rodlen intended, Tiger supported. So now someone just needs to resolve.
--
ais523
